
Inland Architect and
New Record
August 1895, vol. XXVI

Philip Livingston, photographer, 2004
Courtesy, Columbia College Chicago

Name:
South Michigan Campus
Address:
623 S. Wabash
Size:
120 feet x 170 feet, 10 stories
Architect:
Solon S. Beman, 1895
Renovation architect: Michael Arenson, 1987
Original Name:
Studebaker Brothers Building
Subsequent Names:
Second Studebaker Building
Brunswick, Balke, Collender Building
Present Name:
Columbia College Wabash Campus
Acquired by College: 1983
Original Building Type: Office
Style:
Chicago Commercial, detailed in Gothic Revival Style
|
|
|
|
History
623 S. Wabash Avenue was built in 1895 by Solon
S. Beman, architect of the industrial town of Pullman,
one of the nineteenth century’s largest, most complex,
and globally famous planned industrial communities for the
Pullman Palace Car Company. The ten-story 623 S. Wabash
building was originally built for the Studebaker Brothers
Carriage Company of Fort Wayne, Indiana as its Chicago regional
office and warehouse facility. It was later owned by the
Brunswick Company, makers of wood furnishings and built-in
furniture for libraries, universities and a variety of public
commercial and governmental facilities. By the late 19th
century Brunswick became specialists in designing such entertainment
furnishings as bars, billiards tables, and bowling alleys
for drinking establishments nationwide. Subsequent owners
are unknown. The building was acquired by Columbia in 1983
and now houses classrooms, academic offices, a computerized
newsroom, sciences laboratories, art studios, stage and
costume design workshops and two public gallery spaces.
Design Philosophy
Solon S. Beman was, like his teacher, Richard Upjohn, an
architect who studied historic architectural styles to better
solve the design problems of his time. Unlike his mentor,
however, he was interested in and made use of the newest
available technologies when he deemed them essential to
the solution of the design problem at hand. An architect
who worked in a broad range of building types, Beman’s
residences and churches are thoroughly demonstrative of
historic revival styles, particularly the Gothic and Classical.
In his industrial work, however, the style of the building
is applied to a practical solution that makes for a tall
building with many floors, each having an open floor plan
filled with maximum natural light.
The problems to be solved in developing tall commercial
buildings were enormous; there was a need for many stories
of space, yet historic masonry load bearing structures of
great height required thick walls, particularly at their
base. This was not satisfactory, in part due to the expense
of the materials, and due to the fact that, for building
owners, the ground floor retail space represented the most
valuable rent per square foot. If a significant percentage
of this valuable space were lost to the thickness of the
walls, the building would not be nearly as profitable, and
the purpose for erecting it would be lost. An additional
problem was height; the more stairs a tenant had to climb,
the less could be charged in rent. And, especially in Chicago
during the years after the Great Fire, the problem of fireproofing
a tall building needed to be solved.
Beman followed the lead of another prominent Chicago architect,
William LeBaron Jenney, and made his own contributions to
the development of the skyscraper, as did Dankmar Adler
and Louis Sullivan, and Daniel Burnham and John Root. They
found the solution in hanging the entire building from a
metal structural skeleton, allowing it to carry all of the
weight of the building, isolating it and bringing it to
the foundation through the vertical supports. This relieved
the walls of any load-bearing function, effectively turning
them into screens which kept the weather out, and allowing
them to be open in an unprecedented way. Because the frame
allowed for thinner, more open walls, the problems presented
by thick masonry walls were solved, and buildings became
more brilliantly illuminated, more spacious, and therefore
more profitable for their owners and their retail tenants.
This development is demonstrated very effectively by the
façade of the 623 South Wabash Building, where the
windows occupy nearly the entire opening of every bay.
The problem of fireproofing was solved by cladding the
structural supports in terra cotta, and the floors could
be made of the same material to help keep any fire from
spreading quickly from floor to floor. Lastly, the problem
of height was solved by elevators, which went through a
dramatic period of technical advance during the 1880s, particularly
with the introduction of electric elevators in 1887. With
the exertion of stair-climbing eliminated, not only were
tall buildings practical, but the potential rate of income
from higher floors was greatly increased.
The former Second Studebaker/Brunswick Building is a Chicago
Commercial Style building, characterized by the clear expression
of its structural frame, by the lack of thick masonry in
imitation of load-bearing walls, particularly at its base,
and by windows of historically unprecedented size. Its original
use, as an office, final assembly, and display building
for the carriages and wagons of the Studebaker Brothers
Company of South Bend, Indiana, demanded the open floor
plans and large windows only the skyscraper could offer.
The use of Gothic Revival terra cotta ornament was seen
at the time as appropriate to a modern high-rise building;
in the eyes of these designers, the affinities of modern
buildings with the Gothic were obvious in that they shared
great height, both had predominantly a vertical emphasis
in massing and detailing, and both had structural systems
that allowed for enormous windows.
Description
The 623 South Wabash Building is a ten story metal frame
structure standing in the middle of a block facing Wabash
Avenue. It is seven bays wide, having six bays of equal
size divided axially by the smaller bay at the center that
stands above the entrance. It is currently faced with black
granite on its first two floors and above and around its
entrance, with red terra cotta that has been painted gray
on its third through ninth floors, and with similarly painted
brick on its tenth floor and parapet. Its side and rear
walls are common brick.
The former Second Studebaker/Brunswick Building is a Chicago
Commercial Style building, characterized by the clear expression
of its structural frame, by the lack of thick masonry in
imitation of load-bearing walls, particularly at its base,
and by windows of historically unprecedented size that almost
completely fill the openings of the structural bays. Carl
Condit celebrated the openness of the façade as a
prime example of the aesthetic transformation of design
through the use of a metal structural frame: “The
Chicago windows and the delicately articulated wall provide
the fullest exploitation of steel framing that the Chicago
School could show at the time” (Condit, Carl. The
Chicago School of Architecture, p. 145.)
The terra cotta cladding on the façade is limited
to the vertical piers, and carries Gothic Revival style
details. These designs reach their culmination by forming
foliate ornaments above and around the ninth floor windows.
The spandrels above the third through eighth floors are
cast iron and also carry details that are meant to evoke
the Gothic style. Unfortunately, the terra cotta and iron
Gothic Revival details on the façade are badly damaged
in many places. Lost material has been replaced with brick
and concrete, and the entire façade has been painted
to disguise the loss of the original materials and unify
the look of the replacement materials.
Campus Preservation Plan
|